[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: file as a directory
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 15:53, Hans Reiser wrote:
> I agree with the below in that sometimes you want to see a collection of
> stuff as one file, and sometimes you want to see it as a tree, and that
> file format browsers can be integrated into file system browsers to look
> seamless to users.
>
> A quibble: A name is just a means to select a file; he is completely
> wrong to think that file browsers will eliminate filenames.
Yes, even if you think of the whole file system as a single "file", you
need a way to select the bit you need, and you will use names for that
(and whether you call that a filename, a file-part name or an object
name doesn't really matter).
It is interesting that both he and I gave the example of a book and
chapters, which is essentially a linear sequence, and the issue was just
the selection of a part of that sequence. It would also be interesting
to think about how you could map an arbitrary data structure more
complicated than a linear sequence (an "object") to disk. This brings up
issues of serialization and object databases....
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
References: