Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>]

* Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Or, should that be?
> > 
> > 	if (prio > 0 && prio <= 20 && policy != SCHED_NORMAL) {
> 
> Or you can just drop the 'prio == 1 &&' part for this test. Ingo was
> trying to be clever to allow some RT bits, but that's not really
> necessary.

actually, there may be some kernel threads that may run at RT priority
99. But i agree, dropping the test for prio==1 should work just as fine.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/