Re: [PATCH] cputime_t patches broke RLIMIT_CPU

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Roland McGrath wrote:
> 
> Yes, that's how it was done before.  The patch I just posted was intended
> to fix the apparent typo without getting any deeper.  Below is an untested
> alternate patch to restore the old behavior under the new macro regime.

Thanks, this one looks good. I have this nagging feeling that the test for 
"every second" should be doable by using a multiply (ie do a
secs_to_cputime(secs) and see if it's smaller than "total - cputime") 
rather than doing the divide that is implied by "cputime_to_secs()", but I 
can't really bring myself to care, and if anything, that test for "did we 
go into the next whole second" really is pretty obscure anyway.

So I can't see anything wrong with this. Anybody else? Going, going..

		Linus "almost gone" Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/