[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: thoughts on kernel security issues
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:35:24 +0000
- Mail-followup-to: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, grendel@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, akpm@xxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0501121058120.2310@ppc970.osdl.org> <20050112161227.GF32024@logos.cnet> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0501121148240.2310@ppc970.osdl.org> <20050112205350.GM24518@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0501121750470.2310@ppc970.osdl.org> <20050113032506.GB1212@redhat.com> <20050113035331.GC9176@beowulf.thanes.org> <1105627951.4664.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050113192512.GA27607@infradead.org> <20050113193356.GA3555@redhat.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:33:56PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:36:33PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > 2.6.9 for example went out with known holes and broken AX.25 (known)
> > > 2.6.10 went out with the known holes mostly fixed but memory corrupting
> > > bugs, AX.25 still broken and the wrong fix applied for the smb holes so
> > > SMB doesn't work on it
> >
> > XFS on 2.6.10 does work.
freudian typo, should have been smbfs as it should be obvious for the
context I replied to.
> Depends on your definition of 'work'.
> It oopses under load with NFS very easily,
Do you have a bugreport?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
References: