Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM

[Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>]

* Lee Revell (rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 12:05 -0800, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > Anyway, *plonk*.
> 
> Plonk?  WTF?  Jack comes up with what many people think is a reasonable
> solution to a real problem, that affects thousands of users, and in the
> middle of what seems to me a civilized discussion, you killfile him
> because he disagrees with you?
> 
> Plonk to you too, asshole.

Guys, could we please bring this back to a useful discussion.  None of
you have commented on whether the rlimits for priority are useful.  As I
said before, I've no real problem with the module as it stands since it's
tiny, quite contained, and does something people need.  But I agree it'd
be better to find something that's workable as long term solution.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/