[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.6.x features log
- From: Rahul Karnik <deathdruid@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:54:22 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=KKYGuQ0ZUb60Z8zafWrVMQYUAj2yIS7C72YP8f0XQe0g7kPjD+UljsIpJfM21RoLPDG8qJpWl2tizwyqxVY/llcc4Nt1nijQstXAfmYImk/oMhswfMbGaWiFzf+h1XAJZKDubuXLiQ6xo+bf3VPx/4BBSbITTTPrwFo8965isrg=
- References: <41DEC82C.4040502@osdl.org>
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:34:36 -0800, Randy.Dunlap <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What I'm seeing (and getting a little concerned about,
> although I dislike PR with a passion) is that the 2.6.x
> continuous development cycle will cause us (the Linux
> community) to miss logging some of these important new
> features (outside of bk). Has anyone kept a track of new
> features that are being added in 2.6?
Personally speaking, the key feature of the Halloween document was not
documenting what new features we had in the kernel -- it was the
ability to see what _user-visible_ changes there were. As a
"mainstream" user, I might not care much about a new O(1) scheduler,
but I might be affected by the removal of (say) ipchains.
Thanks,
Rahul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References: