Google luky.org euqset.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH /3] sh64: remove cli()/sti() from arch/sh64/*


On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:22:47PM -0600, James Nelson wrote:
> This series of patches is to remove the last cli()/sti() function calls in arch/sh64.

Wait a minute.  Is that just a blanket search-and-replace job?  There is
a reason why cli/sti is marked obsolete instead of being silently #define'd
that way.  Namely, in a lot of cases users of cli/sti are actually racy.

For such instances replacing these with local_... would not improve anything
(obviously) *and* would hide a trouble spot by silencing a warning.

I'm not familiar with the architectures in question, so it might very well
be that all replacements so far had been correct.  However, I would really
like to see rationale for each of those warning removals to go along with
the patches.

Note that basically you are doing "remove the warning in foo.c:42 and
keep the current behaviour".  The missing part is "current behaviour is,
in fact, correct in that place and does not deserve a warning because
<list of reasons>".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


$B$3$N>pJs$,$"$J$?$NC5$7$F$$?$b$N$+$I$&$+A*Br$7$F$/$@$5$!#(B
yes/$B$^$5$K$3$l$@!*(B   no/$B0c$&$J$!(B   part/$B0lIt8+$D$+$C$?(B   try/$B$3$l$G;n$7$F$_$k(B

$B$"$J$?$,C5$7$F$$?>pJs$O$I$N$h$&$J$3$H$+!"$4<+M3$K5-F~2<$5$!#FC$K!V$^$5$K$3$l$@!*!W$H8@$&>l9g$O5-F~$r$*4j$$7$^$9!#(B
$BNc(B:$B!VJ#?t$N%^%7%s$+$i(BCATV$B7PM3$G(Bipmasquerade$B$rMxMQ$7$F(BWeb$B$r;2>H$7$?$>l9g$N@_Dj$K$D$$F!W(B
Follow-Ups: References: