Google luky.org euqset.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

sh: inconsistent kallsyms data


Building 2.6.10 for sh results in inconsistent kallsyms data. Turning on
CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL fixes it, as does CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS.

The symbols that seem to be problematic between the second and third
pass are all kallsyms special symbols. With only CONFIG_KALLSYMS set we
see:

--- System.map  2004-12-31 10:53:10.278567522 -0600
+++ .tmp_System.map     2004-12-31 10:53:10.347558024 -0600
@@ -6868,9 +6868,9 @@
 8817c4d0 D kallsyms_addresses
 88182660 D kallsyms_num_syms
 88182670 D kallsyms_names
-88190630 D kallsyms_markers
-881906a0 D kallsyms_token_table
-88190b50 D kallsyms_token_index
+881906a0 D kallsyms_markers
+88190710 D kallsyms_token_table
+88190bc0 D kallsyms_token_index
 88191000 D irq_desc
 88191000 A __per_cpu_end
 88191000 A __per_cpu_start

So for some reason we have a 0x70 variance between these, and only
these. Running with --all-symbols this seems to work fine.

Looking at scripts/kallsyms.c:symbol_valid, we see:

/* Symbols which vary between passes.  Passes 1 and 2 must have
 * identical symbol lists.  The kallsyms_* symbols below are only added
 * after pass 1, they would be included in pass 2 when --all-symbols is
 * specified so exclude them to get a stable symbol list.
 */

Going by this it's not entirely clear if there is a problem or not. If
these symbols are supposed to be excluded due to being "special", then
it doesn't seem like verify_kallsyms in the top-level Makefile is doing
the right thing by just doing a blind cmp -s. This comment also seems to
be a bit outdated or just generally inaccurate, as --all-symbols isn't
the default behaviour unless CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL is set.

Attachment: pgp0qNLWXYJhF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


$B$3$N>pJs$,$"$J$?$NC5$7$F$$?$b$N$+$I$&$+A*Br$7$F$/$@$5$!#(B
yes/$B$^$5$K$3$l$@!*(B   no/$B0c$&$J$!(B   part/$B0lIt8+$D$+$C$?(B   try/$B$3$l$G;n$7$F$_$k(B

$B$"$J$?$,C5$7$F$$?>pJs$O$I$N$h$&$J$3$H$+!"$4<+M3$K5-F~2<$5$!#FC$K!V$^$5$K$3$l$@!*!W$H8@$&>l9g$O5-F~$r$*4j$$7$^$9!#(B
$BNc(B:$B!VJ#?t$N%^%7%s$+$i(BCATV$B7PM3$G(Bipmasquerade$B$rMxMQ$7$F(BWeb$B$r;2>H$7$?$>l9g$N@_Dj$K$D$$F!W(B
Follow-Ups: