-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I don't think I was arguing against it completely, exactly because I'm > just saying it should be optional. And the result is that the current fast syscall handling on x86-64 is completely unacceptable. If it's not change security enhancements are not possible since the libc has to hardcode the address. - -- Ulrich Drepper Red Hat, Inc. 444 Castro St Mountain View, CA -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAI10P2ijCOnn/RHQRAuegAKCtk8W1cXWKlTWkDrmfJfykzvqATQCfRX4Q cUVAR4+yIue/MFRL2xNbwfQ= =VHoF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patchAndrea Arcangeli
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patchAndrea Arcangeli
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patchRik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patchAndrea Arcangeli
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] Load balancing problem in 2.6.2-mm1
- Next by Date: Re: 2.4.24 HIGHMEM=300m: BUG: wrong zone alignment, it will crash
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patch
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patch
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]