On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:15:00PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > However I'm unsure if you want all applications to be relocated > > ranodmly, and in turn if you want the vsyscalls relocated for all apps, > > exactly because this carry a cost. I think it should be optional. > > If you think extra security should be optional, please don't > argue against it completely. I don't think I was arguing against it completely, exactly because I'm just saying it should be optional. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patchUlrich Drepper
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patchAndrea Arcangeli
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patchRik van Riel
- Prev by Date: Linux Capabilities and Other Security Models Documentation?
- Next by Date: Re: usb mouse/keyboard problems under 2.6.2
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patch
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patch
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]