On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > However I'm unsure if you want all applications to be relocated > ranodmly, and in turn if you want the vsyscalls relocated for all apps, > exactly because this carry a cost. I think it should be optional. If you think extra security should be optional, please don't argue against it completely. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patchAndrea Arcangeli
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patchAndrea Arcangeli
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.2] Documentation/SubmittingPatches
- Next by Date: Linux Capabilities and Other Security Models Documentation?
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patch
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patch
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]