> I'll stop there for now. There seems to be a lot of code in the file > that's one-off from current kernel code. I think a close examination of > currently available kernel functions could drasticly reduce the size of > your module. Preferably to 0 ... this should be part of the core kernel, not a module. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Active Memory Defragmentation: Our implementation & problemsAlok Mooley
- Re: Active Memory Defragmentation: Our implementation & problemsDave Hansen
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.0, cdrom still showing directories after being erased
- Next by Date: 2.6 probe.c "pcibus_class" Device Class, release function
- Previous by thread: Re: Active Memory Defragmentation: Our implementation & problems
- Next by thread: Re: Active Memory Defragmentation: Our implementation & problems
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]