Philip Martin <philip _at_ codematters.co.uk> wrote: > > My test is a software build of about 200 source files (written in C) > that I usually build using "nice make -j4". Timing the build on > 2.4.24 I typically get something like > > 242.27user 81.06system 2:44.18elapsed 196%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k > 0inputs+0outputs (1742270major+1942279minor)pagefaults 0swaps > > and on 2.6.1 I get > > 244.08user 116.33system 3:27.40elapsed 173%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k > 0inputs+0outputs (0major+3763670minor)pagefaults 0swaps I didn't notice the increase in system time. Could you generate a kernel profile? Add `profile=1' to the kernel boot command line and run: sudo readprofile -r sudo readprofile -M10 time make -j4 readprofile -n -v -m /boot/System.map | sort -n +2 | tail -40 | tee ~/profile.txt >&2 on both 2.4 and 2.6? Make sure the System.map is appropriate to the currently-running kernel. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfsPhilip Martin
- 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfsPhilip Martin
- Prev by Date: User-space notification of process end
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfs
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfs
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfs
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]