Andrew Morton wrote: >Philip Martin <philip _at_ codematters.co.uk> wrote: > >>The machine is a dual P3 450MHz, 512MB, aic7xxx, 2 disk RAID-0 and >> ReiserFS. It's a few years old and has always run Linux, most >> recently 2.4.24. I decided to try 2.6.1 and the performance is >> disappointing. >> > >2.6 has a few performance problems under heavy pageout at present. Nick >Piggin has some patches which largely fix it up. > > >> My test is a software build of about 200 source files (written in C) >> that I usually build using "nice make -j4". >> > >Tried -j3? > > Its got 512MB RAM though so its not swapping, is it? Philip, can you please send about 30 seconds of vmstat 1 output for 2.4 and 2.6 while the test is running. Thanks - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfsPhilip Martin
- 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfsPhilip Martin
- Re: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfsAndrew Morton
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfs
- Next by Date: load average calculation in linux 2.6
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfs
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfs
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]