Philip Martin <philip _at_ codematters.co.uk> wrote: > > The machine is a dual P3 450MHz, 512MB, aic7xxx, 2 disk RAID-0 and > ReiserFS. It's a few years old and has always run Linux, most > recently 2.4.24. I decided to try 2.6.1 and the performance is > disappointing. 2.6 has a few performance problems under heavy pageout at present. Nick Piggin has some patches which largely fix it up. > My test is a software build of about 200 source files (written in C) > that I usually build using "nice make -j4". Tried -j3? > Timing the build on > 2.4.24 I typically get something like > > 242.27user 81.06system 2:44.18elapsed 196%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k > 0inputs+0outputs (1742270major+1942279minor)pagefaults 0swaps > > and on 2.6.1 I get > > 244.08user 116.33system 3:27.40elapsed 173%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k > 0inputs+0outputs (0major+3763670minor)pagefaults 0swaps hm, the major fault accounting is wrong. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfsPhilip Martin
- Re: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfsNick Piggin
- 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfsPhilip Martin
- Prev by Date: build error smbfs
- Next by Date: Re: [CRYPTO]: Miscompiling sha256.c by gcc 3.2.3 and arch pentium3,4
- Previous by thread: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfs
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfs
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]