On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:59:26AM +0200, Markus H舖tbacka wrote: > On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Paul Jakma wrote: > > > > 2.0? 2.2 has been out more than long enough for boxes running such > > kernels to have rolled over several times already. > > > Well, not for boxen with 2.0.40-rc8 (Check release date @ernel.org and > be suprised :-) And for more amusement, check release-date for 2.0.40-rc6 first, then -rc7... > > security: if the box concerned is heavily firewalled and partitioned > > away from rest of internet, whats the problem? :) > > > Nah, it's a webserver! Cool. I'm assuming it's NOT an SMP-machine? Regards: David Weinehall -- /) David Weinehall <tao _at_ acc.umu.se> /) Northern lights wander (\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Full colour fire (/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: Uptime counterMarkus H舖tbacka
- Re: Uptime counterPaul Jakma
- Re: Uptime counterMarkus H舖tbacka
- Prev by Date: Re: APM good, ACPI bad (2.6.2-rc1 / p4 HT / Uniwill N258SA0)
- Next by Date: Re: Uptime counter
- Previous by thread: Re: Uptime counter
- Next by thread: Re: Uptime counter
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]