On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, David Weinehall wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:07:40AM +0200, Markus H舖tbacka wrote: [..snip..] > > Well, since most of the changes in the latest kernels involve > networking, trying it with various different network-adapters would be > interesting, and stress-testing the network-code in general. > > If you have the hardware or a really good confidence, a recent > 2.2-kernel to compare with and sufficient knowledge of C, have a look at > the network-drivers for a2065 and ariadne, both of which lack the > padding-fixes the other adapters have, since I didn't want to touch that > mess... > I don't have that hardware to test on, but I can stress test it tomorrow, give the box a _high_ load, and that way help testing. Thanks for the suggestions. Markus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: Uptime counterDavid Weinehall
- Prev by Date: Re: Uptime counter
- Next by Date: hal daemon and ide-floppy
- Previous by thread: Re: Uptime counter
- Next by thread: Re: Uptime counter
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]