On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Markus Hテ、stbacka wrote: > I know, but running a 2.0.x machine with that kind of uptime isn't > really that bad, thought if the machine has alot of accounts it > wouldn't be that great idea. 2.0? 2.2 has been out more than long enough for boxes running such kernels to have rolled over several times already. security: if the box concerned is heavily firewalled and partitioned away from rest of internet, whats the problem? :) > But anyway, thanks for the information! > > Markus regards, -- Paul Jakma paul _at_ clubi.ie paul _at_ jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A warning: do not ever send email to spam _at_ dishone.st Fortune: "Probably the best operating system in the world is the [operating system] made for the PDP-11 by Bell Laboratories." - Ted Nelson, October 1977 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: Uptime counterMarkus H舖tbacka
- Re: Uptime counterWakko Warner
- Re: Uptime counterMarkus H舖tbacka
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Crazy idea: Design open-source graphics chip
- Next by Date: Re: Uptime counter
- Previous by thread: Re: Uptime counter
- Next by thread: Re: Uptime counter
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]