David S. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:35:20 -0500 (EST) > James Morris <jmorris _at_ redhat.com> wrote: > > >>Proposed patch below. I think sha512 would have been ok, but might as >>well make them the same. >> >>R Chan, please test and let us know if it fixes the problem for you. > > > I'm putting this into my tree(s), thanks James. What didn't you like about Jakob's patch which avoids the 64 byte size penalty? -- bill davidsen <davidsen _at_ tmr.com> CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [CRYPTO]: Miscompiling sha256.c by gcc 3.2.3 and arch pentium3,4David S. Miller
- Re: [CRYPTO]: Miscompiling sha256.c by gcc 3.2.3 and arch pentium3,4Linus Torvalds
- Re: [CRYPTO]: Miscompiling sha256.c by gcc 3.2.3 and arch pentium3,4James Morris
- Re: [CRYPTO]: Miscompiling sha256.c by gcc 3.2.3 and archpentium3,4David S. Miller
- Prev by Date: Re: Uptime counter
- Next by Date: Re: [CRYPTO]: Miscompiling sha256.c by gcc 3.2.3 and arch pentium3,4
- Previous by thread: Re: [CRYPTO]: Miscompiling sha256.c by gcc 3.2.3 and archpentium3,4
- Next by thread: Re: [CRYPTO]: Miscompiling sha256.c by gcc 3.2.3 and arch pentium3,4
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]