Hi! > The real question we have to ask ourselves is, what would be the > market demand for a graphics card that is 3 generations behind the > state of the art and over-priced, the only advantage being that it's > a 100% open architecture? > > I don't have _100k to have it fabricated, so we have to goad some > company into doing it for us, and given the volumes, they'll have to > charge way more than it's worth if you compare its capabilities > against ATI et al. > > I've got some great ideas for how to do this chip, but they're > frankly nothing revolutionary. The obvious test bed is an FPGA. > That imposes serious limitations on what kind of logic utilization > and performance we can get. The ASIC version can be clocked faster, > but we dare not put in untested logic. (And we can't afford the > tools necessary to do the proper simulation.) > > > So, the big question: How many units a year would be sold for an > underpowered, over-priced graphics card that just happens to be 100% > open and 100% supported? It might be very usefull for embeded folks from opencores... Pavel -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- [OT] Crazy idea: Design open-source graphics chipTimothy Miller
- Re: [OT] Crazy idea: Design open-source graphics chipChristian Unger
- Re: [OT] Crazy idea: Design open-source graphics chipTimothy Miller
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6 input drivers FAQ
- Next by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] udev 015 release
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Crazy idea: Design open-source graphics chip
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] Crazy idea: Design open-source graphics chip
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]