Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz _at_ xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi!

Can you split your patch and drop cosmetic changes?

I have troubles with reading/understanding it,
I assume Jens has similar problems ;-).

BTW maybe we can move things forward:
fix ide-scsi.c and carefully remove Onstream support from ide-tape.c?

--bart

On Wednesday 28 of January 2004 14:24, Willem Riede wrote:
> On 2004.01.03 14:08, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 30 2003, Willem Riede wrote:
> > > On 2003.12.30 13:44, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > >     If people will have me, I am prepared to take on that
> > > > responsibility. I am just concerned that I may not have enough of a
> > > > variety of devices to be able to thoroughly test it (unless the DI-30
> > > > is the only one :-)). What do people see as the requirements to be
> > > > able to maintain ide-scsi?
> > > >
> > > > Well...there's currently not a long line of people wanting to do
> > > > this, so feel free to send in patches (at least cc'd to linux-scsi so
> > > > I can pick them up easily), and we'll see how it goes.
> > >
> > > OK. You did see the patch that came with the original, right? I just
> > > sent it to linux-kernel because the audience there is broader.
> > >
> > > Linus wants Jens to look at it, so I'm waiting for his response.
> >
> > It's pending review, I'll get to it tomorrow...
>
> I guess it's been a long day :-), but can you let me know what
> realistically I can expect?
>
> Thanks, Willem Riede.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/