Re: [RFC/PATCH, 1/4] readX_check() performance evaluation

[David Mosberger <davidm _at_ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 20:39:15 +0100, Andi Kleen <ak _at_ suse.de> said:

  >> Yet they are a good indicator that something is wrong (not performing
  >> properly) or may be failing soon.  I don't think putting on blinders
  >> for such problems is a good idea.  Though I agree that the question of

  Andi> Most server class hardware should log it somewhere and allow
  Andi> to read the event log in the firmware. This even works for
  Andi> unhandleable errors unlike what the OS could do.

And you'd want to reboot your server just so you can check on the soft
failure rate? ;-)

	--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/