On 2004.01.03 14:08, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30 2003, Willem Riede wrote: > > On 2003.12.30 13:44, James Bottomley wrote: > > > If people will have me, I am prepared to take on that responsibility. > > > I am just concerned that I may not have enough of a variety of devices > > > to be able to thoroughly test it (unless the DI-30 is the only one :-)). > > > What do people see as the requirements to be able to maintain ide-scsi? > > > > > > Well...there's currently not a long line of people wanting to do this, > > > so feel free to send in patches (at least cc'd to linux-scsi so I can > > > pick them up easily), and we'll see how it goes. > > > > OK. You did see the patch that came with the original, right? I just sent > > it to linux-kernel because the audience there is broader. > > > > Linus wants Jens to look at it, so I'm waiting for his response. > > It's pending review, I'll get to it tomorrow... I guess it's been a long day :-), but can you let me know what realistically I can expect? Thanks, Willem Riede. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.xBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
- Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.xJens Axboe
- Prev by Date: [PATCH-2.4] add missing '\n' in bonding messages
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH-2.4] add missing '\n' in bonding messages
- Previous by thread: Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x
- Next by thread: Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]