On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 04:02:14PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap _at_ osdl.org> wrote: > > > > So please don't bother with just whitespace changes unless you > > are going to cleanup a <driver | fs | module | etc> completely. > > And if you're going to do that, do the whitespace cleanup _first_, so the > substantive changes to the driver/fs/module/etc can be sanely understood > and reverted if necessary. > > I frequently sneakily remove all newly-added trailing whitespace from the > patches people send me. In 15 years it'll all be gone. This would maybe warrant a bk option to remove trailing whitespace from modified lines. Preferably with an notification that it is happening so if for some reason you do want trailing whitespace you could abort or override. A patch filter that removed trailing whitespace from + lines could also be used. -- ________________________________________________________________ J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies email address: jw _at_ pegasys.ws Remember Cernan and Schmitt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Trailing blanks in source filesRandy.Dunlap
- Re: RFC: Trailing blanks in source filesAndi Kleen
- Re: RFC: Trailing blanks in source filesJoseph D. Wagner
- Re: RFC: Trailing blanks in source filesDavid Weinehall
- Re: RFC: Trailing blanks in source filesRandy.Dunlap
- Re: RFC: Trailing blanks in source filesAndrew Morton
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.2-rc2-bk1 oopses on boot (ACPI patch)
- Next by Date: Re: devfs 199.17 not in 2.4 (was Re:2.4.22 devfs/zlib outstandingupdates ...)
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: Trailing blanks in source files
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: Trailing blanks in source files
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]