Markus H舖tbacka wrote:
>Hey David,
>I just mail to tell you that 2.0.40-rc8 seems to work really well, no
>problems compiling (except a few warnings :) and absolutely no problem
>running. Great work!
>
> Markus
>
>
Hello all 2.0 hackers,
Recently I just have such an idea that is to port the 2.0.39 to let it
be compiled with my gcc 2.95.4 or any
other latest gcc. At the same time, also make it remain compliant to
gcc 2.7.2.1. ( I can't find 2.7.2.1, only 2.7.2.3
on the ftp) Is this work worth while?
Coywolf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.0.40-rc8] Works wellDavid Weinehall
- [PATCH 2.0.39] put_last_free() defined, but not usedCoywolf Qi Hunt
- Re: [PATCH 2.0.39] put_last_free() defined, but not usedDavid Weinehall
- [2.0.40-rc8] Works wellMarkus H舖tbacka
- Prev by Date: devfs 199.17 not in 2.4 (was Re:2.4.22 devfs/zlib outstanding updates...)
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.2-rc2-bk1 oopses on boot (ACPI patch)
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.0.40-rc8] Works well
- Next by thread: Re: [2.0.40-rc8] Works well
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]