On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 08:53:24PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Yes, it does. But JFS should get the right size from the gendisk anyway. > Or did you create the raid with the filesystem already existant? While that > appears to work for a non-full ext2/ext3 filesystem it's not something you > should do because it makes the filesystem internal bookkeeping wrong and > you'll run into trouble with any filesystem sooner or later. The key words here is *appears* to work. No matter what the filesystem, as Chrisoph says, you'll run into trouble sooner or later.... - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- md raid + jfs + jfs_fsckFlorian Huber
- Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsckDave Kleikamp
- Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsckFlorian Huber
- Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsckDave Kleikamp
- Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsckChristoph Hellwig
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC/PATCH, 2/4] readX_check() performance evaluation
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.2-rc2-bk1 oopses on boot (ACPI patch)
- Previous by thread: Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsck
- Next by thread: Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsck
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]