In message <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401271142510.7855 _at_ serv> you write: > Hi, Hi Roman! > Fixing this requires changing every single module, but in the end it > would be worth it, as it avoids the duplicated protection and we had > decent module unload semantics. And I still disagree. <shrug> If it's any consolation, I don't plan any significant module work in 2.7. If you want to work on this, you're welcome to it. Perhaps you can convince Linus et al that it's worth the pain? Cheers, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups: References:
- Prev by Date: Re: NGROUPS 2.6.2rc2
- Next by Date: Re: PATCH: (as177) Add class_device_unregister_wait() and platform_device_unregister_wait() to the driver model core
- Previous by thread: Re: PATCH: (as177) Add class_device_unregister_wait() andplatform_device_unregister_wait() to the driver model core
- Next by thread: Re: PATCH: (as177) Add class_device_unregister_wait() andplatform_device_unregister_wait() to the driver model core
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]