On Tuesday January 27, hch _at_ infradead.org wrote: > > You can't partition md devices (yet), but otherwise yes. I think you can > also create md device without the persistant superblock still, but it > always was a pain to maintain those. non-persistent superblock arrays only work for raid0 and linear (i.e. not redundancy). RAID1 and RAID5 need a superblock. NeilBrown > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- md raid + jfs + jfs_fsckFlorian Huber
- Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsckDave Kleikamp
- Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsckFlorian Huber
- Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsckDave Kleikamp
- Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsckChristoph Hellwig
- Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsckFlorian Huber
- Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsckChristoph Hellwig
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i2c driver fixes for 2.6.2-rc2
- Next by Date: Re: NGROUPS 2.6.2rc2
- Previous by thread: Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsck
- Next by thread: Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsck
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]