Martin J. Bligh wrote: > This patch removes memblks from the kernel ... we don't use them, and > the NUMA API that was planning to use them when they were originally > designed isn't going to use them anymore. They're just unnecessary > added complexity now ... time for them to go. > > There's a slight complication in that ia64 uses something with a similar > name for part of its memory layout, but Jes Sorensen kindly untangled them > from each other for us. The patch with his modifications is below. Jes > tested it on ia64, and I testbuilt it with every config in my arsenal. > > Please apply ... thanks, > > M. As the unfortunate soul who pushed this whole memblk concept way back when, I'll add my support for their removal. The things I envisioned happening with memblks never materialized and so Martin is right, now they're just taking up space. Adios memblks, we barely knew ye. Cheers! -Matt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Remove memblks from the kernelYasunori Goto
- [PATCH] Remove memblks from the kernelMartin J. Bligh
- Prev by Date: Re: Encrypted Filesystem
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] crypto/sha256.c crypto/sha512.c
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove memblks from the kernel
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove memblks from the kernel
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]