Hi! > I'd call it "noexpress". pciexp sounds like PCI exception, PCI > expected or something... Well, "noexpress" sounds like it does nothing in common with PCI, which is more misleading than the connotations you mention. Have a nice fortnight -- Martin `MJ' Mares <mj _at_ ucw.cz> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/ Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth P.C.M.C.I.A. stands for `People Can't Memorize Computer Industry Acronyms' - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] PCI Express Enhanced Config Patch - 2.6.0-test11Stefan Smietanowski
- RE: [patch] PCI Express Enhanced Config Patch - 2.6.0-test11Durairaj, Sundarapandian
- Re: [patch] PCI Express Enhanced Config Patch - 2.6.0-test11Andi Kleen
- Re: [patch] PCI Express Enhanced Config Patch - 2.6.0-test11Alan Cox
- Re: [patch] PCI Express Enhanced Config Patch - 2.6.0-test11Randy.Dunlap
- Re: [patch] PCI Express Enhanced Config Patch - 2.6.0-test11Pavel Machek
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] PCI Express Enhanced Config Patch - 2.6.0-test11
- Next by Date: Re: Userland headers available
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] PCI Express Enhanced Config Patch - 2.6.0-test11
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] PCI Express Enhanced Config Patch - 2.6.0-test11
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]