On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 01:21:45PM -0800, john stultz wrote: > On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 12:00, timothy parkinson wrote: > > su -c "/usr/sbin/hdparm /dev/hda" > > Password: > > > > /dev/hda: > > multcount = 16 (on) > > IO_support = 1 (32-bit) > > unmaskirq = 0 (off) > > using_dma = 0 (off) > > keepsettings = 0 (off) > > readonly = 0 (off) > > readahead = 256 (on) > > geometry = 65535/16/63, sectors = 156301488, start = 0 > > > > but... > > > > su -c "/usr/sbin/hdparm -d1 /dev/hda" > > Password: > > > > /dev/hda: > > setting using_dma to 1 (on) > > HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted > > using_dma = 0 (off) > > > > it's an 80gig western digital from about 2-3 years ago. > > Its likely you need to enable support in the kernel for your IDE > controller, or your DMA on your controller isn't supported. > > thanks > -john > > so, apparently the problem was that i just needed to enable dma... which meant that i needed to set "CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX=y" in my .config. been running all night/morning with load - no "losing ticks" message or slowing clock yet. thanks for pointing me in the right direction. think we could improve that error message? i'd never have guessed that it was hard disk related if you hadn't told me... timothy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.1 "clock preempt"?john stultz
- 2.6.1 "clock preempt"?Steinar Hauan
- Re: 2.6.1 "clock preempt"?john stultz
- Re: 2.6.1 "clock preempt"?Steinar Hauan
- Re: 2.6.1 "clock preempt"?john stultz
- Re: 2.6.1 "clock preempt"?timothy parkinson
- Re: 2.6.1 "clock preempt"?john stultz
- Re: 2.6.1 "clock preempt"?timothy parkinson
- Re: 2.6.1 "clock preempt"?john stultz
- Re: 2.6.1 "clock preempt"?timothy parkinson
- Re: 2.6.1 "clock preempt"?john stultz
- Prev by Date: Re: Hard lock-ups with 2.6.2-rc1; plus is there an "ac" equivalent for 2.6.x?
- Next by Date: Re: KGDB 2.0.3 with fixes and development in ethernet interface
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.1 "clock preempt"?
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.1 "clock preempt"?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]