On Friday 23 of January 2004 19:47, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I've done precisely the same thing for Debian - if I find the time,
> I'll compare...
How much testing did you have?
> I would really like to come up with an approach to maintain this
> interface definition in the kernel source. I'm still trying to think
> of a way to do it without breaking compatibility or kernel builds.
As I really would like that (less work for me :) I do not think this is
possible. First thing - 2.4 compatibility in 2.6 kernel would seem weird to
say at least. Second - I've ripped out kernel code where I could and used
glibc includes instead - this is (a) The Right Thing (tm) and (b) practically
undoable inside kernel or would require huge amounts of work, which is really
better of left outside.
--
Kay czĽŚowiek, kty naprawdĽ˝yje, nie ma charakteru, nie moĽ˝e go mie
Charakter jest zawsze martwy, otacza cizgniĽŚa struktura przeniesiona z
przeszĽŚoĽŤci. JeĽ˝eli dziaĽŚasz zgodnie z charakterem wtedy nie dziaĽŚasz w oge
- jedynie mechanicznie reagujesz. { Osho }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Userland headers availableMariusz Mazur
- Re: Userland headers availableDaniel Jacobowitz
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] make ide-cd handle non-2kB sector sizes
- Next by Date: Equivalent of 2.4's "CONFIG_FILTER" in 2.6?
- Previous by thread: Re: Userland headers available
- Next by thread: Re: Userland headers available
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]