On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 16:40, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 21:44:37 +0000, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > What do you think about individual email (non-list) using a confirmation > > based spam blocking system. > > for personal email it is plain asocial. it tells me that > a person does not want to receive mail from me. For me, that isn't what it says at all. It tells me that he or she is tired of receiving and sorting all of the spam every day. Since I feel exactly the same way about spam, I cooperate and reply with a confirmation. -- Zan Lynx <zlynx _at_ acm.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] Confirmation Spam Blocking was: List 'linux-dvb' closed topublic postsRik van Riel
- Re: [OT] Confirmation Spam Blocking was: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public postsJes Sorensen
- Re: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public postsDave Jones
- Re: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public postsLinus Torvalds
- Re: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public postsZan Lynx
- Re: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public postsDave Jones
- [OT] Confirmation Spam Blocking was: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public postsMike Fedyk
- Re: [OT] Confirmation Spam Blocking was: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public postsAndreas Jellinghaus
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Redundancy eliminating file systems, breaking MD5, donating money to OSDL
- Next by Date: Re: Nvidia drivers and 2.6.x kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Confirmation Spam Blocking was: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public posts
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] Confirmation Spam Blocking was: List 'linux-dvb' closed topublic posts
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]