> What do you think about individual email (non-list) using a confirmation > based spam blocking system. Consider a spammer using your address and spams people. Say 25000 of those use this method (Called challenge response authentication protocol). You'll get bombarded with 25000 challenge message. You put the burden on the sender, not the spammer which is pretty much useless. There was a discussion about this on exim-users and someone posted a web page. http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Rants/challenge-response.html > I currently use spamassassin to filter my messages, but I saw recently a > project that asks you to reply to a confirmation message if you're not > already on the white-list. > > I'm not sure how acceptable it would be, and this is a little OT, but I'm > wondering if I should spend the time testing that for my corp. I for one refuse to answer those challenges unless I know it was due to a spammer. Defeats the purpose. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups: References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Confirmation Spam Blocking was: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public posts
- Next by Date: Re: PPC KGDB changes and some help?
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Confirmation Spam Blocking was: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public posts
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] Confirmation Spam Blocking was: List 'linux-dvb' closed to public posts
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]