On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Mike Waychison wrote: > > > >Transparency of an autofs filesystem (as I'm calling it) is the situation > >where, given a map > > > >/usr /man1 server:/usr/man1 > > /man2 server:/usr/man2 > > > >where the filesystem /usr contains, say a directory lib, that needs to be > >available while also seeing the automounted directories. > > > > > > > I see. This requires direct mount triggers to do properly. Trying to > do it with some sort of passthrough to the underlying filesystem is a > nightmare waiting to happen.. > So what are we saying here? We install triggers at /usr/man1 and /usr/man2. Then suppose the map had a nobrowse option. Does the trigger also take care of hiding man1 and man2? Is there some definition of these triggers? Ian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern AutofsMike Waychison
- Re: [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofsraven
- Re: [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern AutofsMike Waychison
- Re: [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern AutofsIan Kent
- Re: [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern AutofsMike Waychison
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.1 and irq balancing
- Next by Date: Re: smp dead lock of io_request_lock/queue_lock patch
- Previous by thread: Re: [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs
- Next by thread: Re: [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]