Matt Mackall wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:54:12PM -0800, George Anzinger wrote: > >>Pavel Machek wrote: >> >>>Hi! >>> >>>No real code changes, but cleanups all over the place. What about >>>applying? >>> >>>Ouch and arch-dependend code is moved to kernel/kgdb.c. I'll probably >>>do x86-64 version so that is rather important. >>> >>> Pavel >> >>A few comments: >> >>I like the code seperation. Does it follow what Amit is doing? It would >>be nice if Amit's version and this one could come together around this. >> >>I don't think we want to merge the eth and regular kgdb just yet. I would, >>however, like to keep eth completly out of the stub. Possibly a new module >>which just takes care of steering the I/O to the correct place. > > > I've sent Amit the start of an plug interface for abstracting the > communication layer. Should be relatively painless and allow for > starting sessions on the interface of your choice. > May I see? -- George Anzinger george _at_ mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: kgdb cleanupsMatt Mackall
- kgdb cleanupsPavel Machek
- Re: kgdb cleanupsGeorge Anzinger
- Re: kgdb cleanupsMatt Mackall
- Prev by Date: 2.4.24 eth0: TX underrun, threshold adjusted.
- Next by Date: Cannot boot after new Kernel Build
- Previous by thread: Re: kgdb cleanups
- Next by thread: Re: kgdb cleanups
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]