Re: kgdb cleanups

[Matt Mackall <mpm _at_ xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:54:12PM -0800, George Anzinger wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >No real code changes, but cleanups all over the place. What about
> >applying?
> >
> >Ouch and arch-dependend code is moved to kernel/kgdb.c. I'll probably
> >do x86-64 version so that is rather important.
> >
> >								Pavel
> A few comments:
> 
> I like the code seperation.  Does it follow what Amit is doing?  It would 
> be nice if Amit's version and this one could come together around this.
> 
> I don't think we want to merge the eth and regular kgdb just yet.  I would, 
> however, like to keep eth completly out of the stub.  Possibly a new module 
> which just takes care of steering the I/O to the correct place.

I've sent Amit the start of an plug interface for abstracting the
communication layer. Should be relatively painless and allow for
starting sessions on the interface of your choice.

-- 
Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : Linux development and consulting
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/