On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 08:23:49AM -0800, Leonid Grossman wrote: > Yes, this is exactly how (at least our 10GbE) PCI-X ASICs work. > If the RO bit is set, the device decides whether the transaction > requires strong ordering, > and sets RO attribute accordingly. Do you have a pointer to the driver source? This would probably make a good reference driver for Jesse's suggestion. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- RE: [RFC] Relaxed PIO read vs. DMA write orderingLeonid Grossman
- Re: [RFC] Relaxed PIO read vs. DMA write orderingGrant Grundler
- RE: [RFC] Relaxed PIO read vs. DMA write orderingLeonid Grossman
- Prev by Date: Support for Toshiba Piccolo in drivers/ide/pci/generic.c
- Next by Date: Re: Problem with 2.4.24 e1000 and keepalived
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Relaxed PIO read vs. DMA write ordering
- Next by thread: RE: [RFC] Relaxed PIO read vs. DMA write ordering
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]