> > i think it's problematic because you can't assume the lock was > granted on the server and the signaled process might not exit > immediately. The point is that it is *worse* to assume the lock was not granted, since then it will never get cleared on the server. The RPC layer blocks all signals except SIGKILL, so the signalled process has no choice but to exit immediately if something gets through. Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups: References:
- Prev by Date: x86_64 + 2.6.1-rc3 panics on aic79xx
- Next by Date: RE: [ANNOUNCE] QLogic qla2xxx driver update available (v8.00.00b7).
- Previous by thread: Re: [NFS client] NFS locks not released on abnormal processtermination
- Next by thread: Re: [NFS] Re: [NFS client] NFS locks not released on abnormal processtermination
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]