martin f krafft wrote: >also sprach Nick Piggin <piggin _at_ cyberone.com.au> [2004.01.08.1634 +0100]: > >>You could try my alternate CPU scheduler which would tell us if your >>problem is the scheduler or something else. Its against the mm tree. >>http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/v29p6.gz >> > >From a quick glance, it mentions the Pentium 4 and Hyperthreading. >This *is* an SMP system, but it uses Athlon XPs. Will your scheduler >still work? > Yeah, my interactivity stuff has to be applied after my SMP stuff, so I had to give you both ;) You'll want to run make oldconfig after patching, and you needn't say yes to CONFIG_SCHED_SMT, although if you did it wouldn't hurt either, it just wouldn't do anything. Nick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- scheduling problems in X with 2.6.0martin f krafft
- Re: scheduling problems in X with 2.6.0Nick Piggin
- Re: scheduling problems in X with 2.6.0martin f krafft
- Re: scheduling problems in X with 2.6.0Nick Piggin
- Re: scheduling problems in X with 2.6.0martin f krafft
- Prev by Date: Re: scheduling problems in X with 2.6.0
- Next by Date: Re: scheduling problems in X with 2.6.0
- Previous by thread: Re: scheduling problems in X with 2.6.0
- Next by thread: Re: scheduling problems in X with 2.6.0
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]