Jan Kasprzak wrote:
: Now I will try to boot 2.6.0-test9 and we will see if it is
: similar to -rc2 or not.
:
-test9 seems to work OK (the same as -test7). I will try -test11
tomorrow.
-Y.
--
| Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.net - private}> |
| GPG: ID 1024/D3498839 Fingerprint 0D99A7FB206605D7 8B35FCDE05B18A5E |
| http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/ Czech Linux Homepage: http://www.linux.cz/ |
| I actually have a lot of admiration and respect for the PATA knowledge |
| embedded in drivers/ide. But I would never call it pretty:) -Jeff Garzik |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: Fw: Performance drop 2.6.0-test7 -> 2.6.1-rc2Nathan Scott
- Re: Fw: Performance drop 2.6.0-test7 -> 2.6.1-rc2Jan Kasprzak
- Re: Fw: Performance drop 2.6.0-test7 -> 2.6.1-rc2Christoph Hellwig
- Re: Fw: Performance drop 2.6.0-test7 -> 2.6.1-rc2Jan Kasprzak
- Prev by Date: Re: Relocation overflow with modules on Alpha
- Next by Date: RE: Kernel 2.6.0 and i2c-viapro posible Bug
- Previous by thread: Re: Fw: Performance drop 2.6.0-test7 -> 2.6.1-rc2
- Next by thread: Re: Any changes in Multicast code between 2.4.20 and 2.4.22/23 ? -> New Info
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]