On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Ian Kent wrote: Oh! This should have related to the comments about removing autofs from the kernel. Sorry about the confusion. > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Mike Waychison wrote: > > > > > This is a good example of why this stuff should probably be merged into > > VFS, autofs4 has yet to be updated to use this lock. This comes with > > the decision to a) no longer support it as a module, only built in, or > > b) make vfsmount_lock accessible to modules. > > Please don't say it this way. > > A new implementation may mean current autofs becomes depricated but > this is a deprecation process, not a slash and burn, and needs to be > managed. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Prev by Date: Re: seperator error in __mask_snprintf_len
- Next by Date: Re: won't work: 2.6.0 && SiI 3112 SATA
- Previous by thread: Re: [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs
- Next by thread: Re: [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]