On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 11:18, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 00:47, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 12:33:12AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > at a time. I have yet to understand why 'ls|cat' behaves > > > differently, but fortunately it works and it has already saved > > > me some useful time. > > > > cat probably does some buffering for you, and sends the output to xterm in > > larger blocks. > > yes indeed, judging from the cat source it does chose optimal buffer > size, here 1024 byte... so it reads/writes larger chunks... and jump > scrolling takes place... > I cannot reboot right now, so have wrong kernel for testing, but could anyone see what happens if you start X reniced to +10 or such? Maybe some other numbers? -- Martin Schlemmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Follow-Ups: References:
- Re: xterm scrolling speed - scheduling weirdness in 2.6 ?!Martin Schlemmer
- Re: xterm scrolling speed - scheduling weirdness in 2.6 ?!szonyi calin
- Re: xterm scrolling speed - scheduling weirdness in 2.6 ?!Willy Tarreau
- Re: xterm scrolling speed - scheduling weirdness in 2.6 ?!Mike Fedyk
- Re: xterm scrolling speed - scheduling weirdness in 2.6 ?!Soeren Sonnenburg
- Prev by Date: Re: file system technical comparisons
- Next by Date: floppy driver and multiple floppies (was Re: 2.6.0 under vmware ?)
- Previous by thread: Re: xterm scrolling speed - scheduling weirdness in 2.6 ?!
- Next by thread: Re: xterm scrolling speed - scheduling weirdness in 2.6 ?!
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]