On January 05, 2004 07:33 am, Samium Gromoff wrote: > At Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:55:00 -0500, > > Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > On December 30, 2003 06:41 am, Samium Gromoff wrote: > > > Reality sucks. > > > > > > People are ignorant enough to turn blind eye to obvious vm regressions. > > > > > > No developers run 64M boxens anymore... > > > > No one is turning a blind eye. Notice Linus has reponded to and is > > interested in this thread. The vm is not perfect in all cases - in most > > cases it is faster though... > > "in most cases it is faster" is a big lie. > > The reality is: on all usual one-way boxes 2.6 goes slower than 2.4 once > you start paging. I would argue that in most case you do not page or page very little - know that is the case here. In any case it does point out what part of the system needs to be improved. Ed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.0 performance problemsDavid Lang
- Re: 2.6.0 performance problemsSamium Gromoff
- Prev by Date: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Next by Date: Re: mremap bug and 2.4?
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.0 performance problems
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.0 performance problems
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]