On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 08:54:36PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks _at_ vt.edu wrote:
> ISTR that SunOS 4.0 handled an NFS-mounted /dev and swap just fine
> some 15 years ago? (in fact, due to performance differences between
> the disks on a Sun3/ 2xx server and the shoebox disk on a 3/50, you
> could page faster over the net than to a local /dev/swap).
Whether it did at some point, or whether it didn't, doesn't really matter.
It doesn't need to, and with the amount of memory that most computers come
with these days, remote access storage for tiny kernel data structures, like
that which would be required for tmpfs /dev that is only populated with the
devices that actually exist, just isn't worth it.
> So it's more a case of "we have decided to do it differently" than
> "that's so nuts that it shouldn't be expected to work"....
I was saying "why do you think this is a good model?" not "I can't imagine
why you would do it..." :-) Sorry it didn't come across as I intended.
mark
--
mark _at_ mielke.cc/markm _at_ ncf.ca/markm _at_ nortelnetworks.com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...
http://mark.mielke.cc/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordAndries Brouwer
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Love
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordLinus Torvalds
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordAndries Brouwer
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordLinus Torvalds
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordAndries Brouwer
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordLinus Torvalds
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordAndries Brouwer
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordMark Mielke
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordValdis.Kletnieks
- Prev by Date: Re: GCC 3.4 Heads-up
- Next by Date: Re: xterm scrolling speed - scheduling weirdness in 2.6 ?!
- Previous by thread: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Next by thread: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]