On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:27:47PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Sure. It is not "need". It is "quality of implementation". > > Consider NFS. > And then a high-quality implementation actually ends up being > _detrimental_. It's hiding problems that can still happen, they just > happen rarely enough that the bugs don't get found and fixed. Empty talk. This is not about finding and fixing bugs. We know very precisely what properties the NFS protocol has. Now one can have a system that works as well as possible with NFS. And one can have a worse system. Andries - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordMark Mielke
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordLinus Torvalds
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Love
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Landley
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Love
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordAndries Brouwer
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Love
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordLinus Torvalds
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordAndries Brouwer
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordLinus Torvalds
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordAndries Brouwer
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordLinus Torvalds
- Prev by Date: Might this help with SCO?
- Next by Date: Re: Might this help with SCO?
- Previous by thread: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Next by thread: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]