On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:16:04PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > If devfs works good on FreeBSD, it probably means that the current > > devfs for Linux is badly designed, not that the idea of devfs is bad. > > I have no idea how FreeBSD implemented devfs. > > If you know how FreeBSD implemented devfs, and how it solves all of the > problems that I detailed in my original posting, I would be interested. The FreeBSD implementation is pretty similar to the devfs we have in 2.6 API- and implementation wise. Just because it works somehow in most situation doesn't mean it's right.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordHelge Hafting
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordGreg KH
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordGreg KH
- Prev by Date: SYM53c8xx Panic on Boot: 2.6.1rc1 (Alpha)
- Next by Date: Re: inode_cache / dentry_cache not being reclaimed aggressively enough on low-memory PCs
- Previous by thread: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Next by thread: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]