Hi! > actively do things that are "silly" on purpose. For example, for > debugging, we start the "jiffies" counter not at zero, but at -300. That's > patently _silly_, but it was very useful in finding the cases where the > rare general case was not handled correctly. BTW, as we are currently in stable series, it might be good idea to make jiffies start at zero... Hopefully jiffie wrap had enough testing during stable... Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordAndries Brouwer
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Love
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Landley
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Love
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordAndries Brouwer
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Love
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordLinus Torvalds
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordAndries Brouwer
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordLinus Torvalds
- Prev by Date: swsusp in 2.6.0 sometimes reports "incorrect version"
- Next by Date: Re: inode_cache / dentry_cache not being reclaimed aggressivelyenough on low-memory PCs
- Previous by thread: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Next by thread: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]