On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 12:21, Nuno Alexandre wrote: > /dev/hda: > Timing buffer-cache reads: 1320 MB in 2.00 seconds = 659.44 MB/sec > Timing buffered disk reads: 140 MB in 3.02 seconds = 46.40 MB/sec > > Using: > -d1 -u1 -m16 -c3 -W1 -A1 -k1 -X70 -a 8192 Wow, slow down for a minute. Most IDE chipset drivers does a excellent job at autotuning the max *safe settings* for your drive/chipset combination. Mucking around with hdparm parameters blindfolded will only cause you grief in form of data loss and system instability sooner than later. Usually when one gets into performance problems with IDE in Linux, the chipset specific driver is not enabled, making the system fallback to the generic driver - OR the drive and controller combination is considered unsafe with faster settings. Without any user intervention at all, my Seagate 7200 120G's does 55MB/s in the infamious hdparm test, on a VIA KT266 based board, both in 2.6.1-rc1 and 2.4.23. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- RE: IDE-RAID Drive PerformanceNicklas Bondesson
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.0-mjb2 useage report (K7-2400/1G/IDE/ASUS-nForce2)
- Next by Date: [2.6.1-rc1] : in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
- Previous by thread: Re: IDE-RAID Drive Performance
- Next by thread: RE: IDE-RAID Drive Performance
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]