On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:40:33 +0100
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech _at_ suse.cz> wrote:
> > +#undef MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX
> > +#define MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX /* empty */
> > +
> > static unsigned int i8042_noaux;
> > module_param(i8042_noaux, bool, 0);
>
> Well, I think it might be cleaner to just drop the i8042_ prefix and go
> with the "i8042." prefix if that's the 2.6 way. It'll annoy a couple
> people, but's it's the way to go in the future.
Yeah, unless there's a good reason, it's nicer if there's symmetry so
people can guess how to pass params.
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too
many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/